Skip to main content

Table 3 The mean improvement in overall scores between baseline and assessment for the control site and adopter sites. Data tested for a difference between the groups via two-tailed, unpaired t tests. Adopter site data is grouped regardless of time point

From: The assessment of a manikin-based low-dose, high-frequency cardiac resuscitation quality improvement program in early UK adopter hospitals

Study sites

Mean improvement CPR (%) (SEM)

Mean improvement compressions (%) (SEM)

Mean improvement ventilation (%) (SEM)

Control site

15.1 (6.1) (n = 22)

5.9 (10.6) (n = 18)

19.9 (10.6) (n = 17)

Adopter sites

14.5 (1.9) (n = 249)

9.5 (2.8) (n = 205)

27.0 (3.5) (n = 129)

p value

0.918

0.622

0.537